Weblog

Monday, 19 October 2009

  • The Most Interesting Conversation (featured question)

    Have I ever overheard an interesting conversation?

    Absolutely. As a writer, I love to listen to conversations of people nearby. I think the most interesting one I've ever overheard was in my university dining building. I was sitting in one of the restaurant areas, finishing up a slice of pizza and scribbling some last minute homework answers, when a tall, thin African-American girl stalked out of the campus store and into the seating area. She flung herself into a nearby chair and crossed her legs. Her phone was pressed so tightly to her ear, I was afraid she was going to cut off circulation.

    Apparently, she had to find a man, get married, and have a child within a certain amount of time (a year and a half, maybe? It was before she turned a certain age), or she wouldn't get the money that a rich relative had left her in a will. Her brother had already met his requirements, which were similar. She was discussing the prospects of a certain young man that she had just met. It sounded as though the person on the other end was arguing that money was not a good enough incentive to marry a random guy and have his baby.

    I stayed to listen to the whole conversation, which ended abruptly when a (male) friend of the girl's came over and she hung up the phone and walked away with him, chatting amiably.

    I think this, with a little tweaking, would make a wonderful story. In any case, if you're a writer, always always ALWAYS eavesdrop. Even if it gets you in trouble. You never know what excellent story peices you will overhear.

    And if you're not a writer, do it anyways. Because it's fun.   

    I just answered this Featured Question; you can answer it too!

Tuesday, 13 October 2009

  • Currently
    Aladdin (Disney Special Platinum Edition)
    By Scott Weinger, Robin Williams, Linda Larkin, Jonathan Freeman, Frank Welker
    see related

    Just picked up a new hobby. Today I whittled my first wooden knife. It's crooked, you can't stab anyone/cut anything with it, and it's only about 6 inches long from blade tip to the end of the hilt, BUT it's done except for the sanding.

    And of course, you know my writing-oriented mind immediately related crafting the knife to crafting a story.

    You start from a base, a foundation (in this case, a blank stick). This base would be the vague story idea in your head. The first slice of the knife, the first word. You cut out the basic shape of the knife. You block in the basic shape of the story. Then, you refine the shape of the knife. This is the writing process known as editing, rewriting, or the seventh circle of writer's hell. The refining process takes small strokes with the knife, delicate care, and a lot of patience, just like actual editing. And eventually you have a finished product that sometimes looks good and is hopefully useful to someone.

    Hope I'm a better writer than I am a whittler... this poor little crooked knife wouldn't even make a good letter opener.

    In other news, fall break is over tomorrow :( I'm so sad to see it go. I'm packing all of my avoided homework into like 3 hours tonight, once I stop procrastinating on Xanga and Facebook.

Monday, 12 October 2009

  • Currently
    Apparitions
    By The Feverfew
    A Song, A Story
    see related

    The Place Where a Tree Can Mean Love...

     
    One of my early stories went like this: "Tiffany the dolphin was swimming along one day when she met a crab. The crab's name was Andy. 'Hi,' said Tiffany, 'I'm Tiffany.'
    'Hi,' said Andy, 'I'm Andy. Can I swim with you? We can be friends!'
    'Sure,' said Tiffany. She liked making friends. Andy and Tiffany swam and talked.
    Andy and Tiffany were swimming along when they met a clown fish...." And repeat. Tiffany apparently never did anything but swim along and meet other sea denizens.
     
    No description, no plot, no meaning, no interest. Of course, I was 6 or so at the time. Fortunately, I've figured out (sort of) plot, description, and hopefully interest.
     
    Having a meaning sometimes eludes me. Fortunately, there's a technique that might help me, and maybe you. The idea is to move up and down the "ladder of abstraction".

    Think of concrete examples at the bottom of the ladder and words that reach for a higher meaning, like "honor", "freedom" and "love" at the top

    In other words, move smoothly between abstract concepts to material examples and back again. This will help the reader grasp the abstract concepts, and will lend substance to the material scenes.

    Why?

    Because all good writing leaves the reader fuller, with meaning or hope or questions, than when the reader began. It gives the reader something. This can effectively be accomplished with some sort of tie to an abstract concept. And abstract concepts are often best understood  (and are the most interesting) when they're tied to something that involves the senses.

    Perfect example in song lyrics:
    "If I get murdered in the city, go read the letter in my desk, don't bother with my belongings, but pay attention to the list. Make sure my sister knows I love her, make sure my mother knows the same, always remember there was nothing worth sharing like the love that let us share our name" - Avett Brothers

    The brother speaking moves from concrete (the city, the letter in his desk, the list) to abstract concepts of love and what it means to be family, and he does it so smoothly.

    Quite often when you write prose the reader can neither see or understand, you are stuck in between. This is the land of bureaucratic language especially, the land of soulless, numbing, politcally correct language, the land of trying to sound "smarter" or more "official" and instead just sounding pretensious.

    Metaphors and similes can help explain abstractions through comparison with concrete things. For example "Her love was like a red red rose, newly sprung in June."

    2 questions will help the writer make sure that he/she is working both ends of the ladder. When looking at an abstraction, or writing about something abstract such as truth, ask yourself "What can I use as an example?" When observing something material, such as a conversation, or a collection of feathers, or an extra place set at a table, ask yourself "What does that mean?" or "What can that mean?"

    In conclusion, I guess what I'm saying is make your writing mean more than just a recounting of events so that the reader feels like he/she gains something, but don't forget that material, sensual examples help drive a reader's interest in the story/article/song.
     
    And for the sake of the writing gods, make sure your story has a plot! Don't continue the legacy of Tiffany the Dolphin.
  • Currently
    Song for the Underdog
    By Bullets and Octane
    Song for the Underdog
    see related

    Stealing the Skin of a Character

    (*Note: Written June 24 2009)

     So, I've been sitting here this morning, pondering some books I like (Cold Mountain by Charles Frazier, The Song of Ice and Fire series by Martin, and Cannery Row by Steinbeck come to mind). I was wondering, what about these books is it that captivated me so much that I didn't want to stop reading them, that I almost physically didn't want to part with the book?

       And I realized, what I love about these books is that they draw me into their world. They take my spirit and stuff it inside whatever character they're following, but it doesn't feel like I've been stuffed. That other person's skin, it feels like it fits.

       The author draws the reader into the perspective of the character wholeheartedly, without reserve, and the reader loves him/her for it. Because reality is all about perspective (just ask anyone who lives with hallucinations; bet those seem real to them), and when an author can draw a character so finely, so distinctly, the effect is not lost on the reader.

       How do I do this? I wondered. At first, I thought, it has to be point of view. The stories that use first person can obviously draw you in easier. But that's not it at all. Because Cold Mountain, The Song of Ice and Fire, Cannery Row...none of these are in first person, and yet there is something about them that is incredibly captivating. Then I realized.

       In all of these books, there are two characteristics that they share. One is the attention to sensory detail. This attention is so fantastic, that you can't help but see what the narrator (or character) sees, smell what the narrator smells, hear what the narrator hears almost exactly the way they hear it. All of the senses are used in description, and there's a lot of description, but it doesn't bog down the writing because it's infused into everything. Action, description, character development, all slipped into one sneaky sentence after another. The sentences all pull double, even triple or quadruple duty.

      Another thing I noticed is that all of the characters are *remarkably* different from each other. The way they see things is different, the way they describe things is different, but still fitting for each character, hell even the way they say things is often different. Two characters can say basically the same sentence and have it come out completely differently. I find this amazing and captivating and something to strive for.

       So I guess the best place to start is to know your characters. I know, it's been said and been said. But I don't mean just know them. I mean, be capable of wearing their skin. If you're in a situation, think "How would Jeff Bob react in this situation?" or "Would Donna Marie tell a joke out of discomfort, to lighten the mood, or just keep her trap shut?" Figure out what aggravates them, what thrills them, the terrible little things that they'd love to hide from the world, even if those little things aren't a big deal, and as you figure these things out, weave the knowledge of them into your writing.

       Another place to start would be to describe. And describe. And describe until you're sick and tired of bloody describing the damn library and that freaking window she's looking out of and you just want to move on to somebody cutting somebody with swords. If there's too much description, you can always take some out when you edit, and it's much easier to remove than it is to add. Besides, the more you describe something, the more likely you are to get even one sentence that has the complete spot on description that you're aiming for. You know, the one that just rings in the mind as being the absolute truth about what that particular scene/object looks like.

    Okay, well, I'm pretty much done now. My brain has wrung out its revelation (a revelation to me, anyways, but I think each writer has to have aha! moments like these, and all the lecturing/explaining in the world only speeds it up a little). My cousin just turned on the tv anyways, so my brain's about to go dead. But I've written half a book, so I don't guess it matters :P

     Anyways, hope this helps anyone who cares to read it. I'll post more writing bits as I read about/discover them.

    In the meantime, good luck.
    Nik

  • Currently
    The Devil Makes Three
    By The Devil Makes Three
    Graveyard
    see related

    The Appetizing Things in the Pond...

    (*Note: This was written in January 2009)
     
    I was thinking today. It was just after my fiction writing class, so of course I was thinking, as I often am anyways, about writing. And I came to a conclusion.Writing is like a pond.
     
    Now, I want you to imagine, for just a second, a pond tucked way back in the woods, circled with lush green trees and ferns and all sorts of life. Maybe little splotches of sun are playing along its surface or whatever.
    And this pond is disgusting. Let me tell you, the surface is just covered with the thickest, ugliest, smelliest brown-green gunk imaginable, with little bugs caught in it and drowning and skittering all over the place. I mean, seriously, this stuff looks like if you drank it, you wouldn't ever get your insides to work properly again.

    But you, as the writer, have to take your bucket to this pond, to this well of words, if you will, and get something suitable to show people, something suitable for others to drink.
    Now, if you just take the bucket and skim the surface, not wanting to put too much effort into it or not wanting to get too close to the pond and take a chance on making a mistake or falling in, then you are gonna get some seriously nasty shit that shouldn't be given to anyone.

    But if you take that bucket and try harder, reach farther, and go BENEATH the surface, you might just get some nice tasty clear water. I mean, sure it might have a little gunk in it, but it's better than what you would have gotten if you hadn't gone beneath the immediately visible surface of things.
     
    I guess what I'm saying is, the best writers, they don't use cliches. They don't go for the easy stuff, the easy characterization, the easy lines and sentences. They strive, above all, to see below the surface of their characters, to see the network of emotions and cause-effect relationships and memories and tics that make up each character. They don't have flat wooden characters. They give enough detail, enough insight, enough of each character's lifeblood, if you will, that they sometimes lead us not only to see the characters, but also to see something within ourselves.

    And that's when they become authors that we love, characters that we identify with and obsess over, stories that we can't put down. Because we see something of ourselves, even if it's something that we never saw inside ourselves before, mirrored on the page.

herowithinyou

  • Visit herowithinyou's Xanga Site
    • Member Since: 7/9/2009

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

[no info]

Groups

[no groups]

Pulse

  • worry worry, super scurry, call out the troops in a hurry, this is what we waited for, this is it boys, this is war (99 Red Balloons)

Photostrip

[no photos]

Recommended

[no recommendations]